![]() You should notice that the head turns only slightly. I want to also say that when you direct the Nimble to move to the left of right, it does not turn that well. It is not going to be easy, especially if you have any hand/wrist problems. The user must twist his/her hand in order to move the direction of the cleaning nozzle head. There is no heavy hand twisting required. This, in turn, turns the cleaning nozzle head. As this is done, the weight of the vacuum is repositioned on the ball. The dyson can turn or maneuver just by leaning the handle to the left or right. This can be checked out for yourself and you do not even need to turn the machine on. Dyson's "ball" uprights can maneuver/turn much better and easier than other swivel/twist uprights. I have to disagree w/both these statements. And perhaps dyson will refine the ball mechanism further. ![]() Talk recently says another dyson ball is due out in short order. As we see from dyson's evolution of the ball since the DC15, a change with the DC18, and then with the DC24/25 ball series. Realizing that the uprights are used primarily on carpeting BUT I find the, as I said, that the dyson ball models are not as easy to use on barefloors and tiles as the swivel/twist of the ORECK, MIELE and NIMBLE. IMacdaddy made the comment that "At first notice, this machine felt much more maneuverable than my old Dyson, and felt that it has a better turning radius as well." They are just another vacuum brand, that would compete w/other brands. To refresh your memory, I am not a "fan" of dyson vacuum cleaners. What I really want to talk about is the main feature, its maneuverability. The Nimble does a very good job of cleaning the carpet. I liked that Electrolux put an aggressive brushroll on this machine. There are some good features like a long cord and hose. The vacuum cleaner does look very futuristic and modern, for a vacuum cleaner, with its flashy painted plastic and metal look. I wanted to comment about the new Electrolux Nimble upright. Vacuum cleaner manufacturers had the right idea when they started using them on rug/floor attachments of suction-only machines back in the day. It requires very little effort to move a vacuum cleaner around furniture. I have found that I can vacuum the same w/o the feature. You have to wonder how well the DD Swivel would do, if it also redesigned their upright w/the swiveling upper body. The front wheels of the Miele make turning the upright much easier. I would have to say that if the Miele did not have the swivel wheels in front, Miele and Electrolux would have the same design. You should find that the turning radius of the dyson is much better and easier than the Nimble. Take a dyson ball and Electrolux Nimble and check it out for yourself. ![]() I have to disagree w/both these statements. ![]() In case he and his army of engineers doesn't realize it, there's a big difference. ![]() James Dyson is still thinking wheel barrows rather than vacuums. Personally and professionally I prefer the swivel and twist features offered by ORECK MIELE and now Electrolux Nimble over the archaic ball dyson has used since 2005 with DC15. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |